Track competitor momentum. Find ranking gaps. Outperform in AI answers.

Seerly visibility tracking answers how your brand is doing, while competitor tracking answers who is taking the space you are not holding, on the same prompts and in the same answers.

One view tells you a topic slipped. The other tells you whether the whole category moved or a single rival published something that worked.

• Your visibility score and rank per topic, tracked over time
• Competitor share of voice inside those same topics
• Prompts where a competitor appears in every run and you appear in none
• The cited sources that carried the competitor into the answer

Reading both is what separates a real loss from ordinary run-to-run variation.

Yes. Seerly classifies every tracked competitor as Brand, Direct, or Indirect, so you can isolate genuine commercial rivals from the publishers and reference sites that also occupy your prompts.

The distinction matters because the response differs. A rival brand calls for positioning work, while a review site that keeps getting cited is usually a coverage opportunity.

• Brand: your own domain, shown in line with the competitive set
• Direct: competing products or services in the same category
• Indirect: publishers, marketplaces, forums, and reference sites holding answer space
• Search and filter across large competitor sets by rank, domain, or category

Filtering by type also shows which class of competitor is driving share movement in a given period.

A topic gap in Seerly is a cluster of prompts where competitors appear consistently and your brand appears rarely or not at all, expressed as win counts per brand across the prompts in that topic.

Gaps are ranked, so the ones worth working on first are visible without reading every prompt.

• Win counts per competitor across each prompt in the topic, such as five of five versus two of five
• The specific prompts you are absent from, with the answers that were returned
• The sources cited in those answers, showing what the winning page covered
• A recommended action attached to the gap, tracked or dismissed by your team

Prompt volume sets how many topics you can watch: 25 prompts a month on Basic, up to 100 on Pro.

Yes. Seerly passes competitive gaps into the content workflow, where the Content Agent drafts pages aimed at the exact prompts a competitor is winning, and your team approves what ships.

The gap carries its evidence with it, so the brief starts from what the cited pages actually covered rather than a guess.

• Comparison pages, FAQs, and long-form drafts generated against the losing prompt
• Recurring content structures that keep earning citations in your category
• Every draft held in an approvals queue, with nothing publishing autonomously
• Optional WordPress publishing on Pro plans once a draft is approved

Re-running the same prompts later gives a measured before-and-after on that gap.

Seerly collects competitor signals from ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overview, and how many of those engines you see depends on your plan.

Keeping them separate matters competitively, because a rival can dominate one engine while being invisible in another.

• Basic: one engine of your choice, either Google AI Overview or ChatGPT
• Pro: all three engines, ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overview
• Enterprise: additional engines on request, under a custom scope
• Your Google search footprint tracked alongside the AI engines

Only public AI responses and public web pages are analyzed to build the competitive picture.