For marketing teams AI search is a channel now. Run it like one.

Seerly tracks a fixed set of buyer prompts on a schedule and records whether your brand was mentioned, at what rank, in what tone, and which sources the answer cited, in one dashboard.

That replaces the usual routine of one person opening an AI assistant, typing a few questions by hand, and screenshotting whatever comes back that week.

• A tracked prompt set: 25 prompts per month on Basic, up to 100 on Pro
• Scheduled runs every 4 days on Basic, and more frequently on Pro
• Mention, rank, and sentiment recorded per engine, never blended into one figure
• The verbatim response and cited URLs stored behind every data point

Because runs are scheduled rather than ad hoc, the history is comparable week to week instead of depending on who checked and when.

Traditional SEO measures where your pages rank on a results page. AI search visibility measures whether an AI assistant names your brand inside its written answer, and how it describes you when it does.

The two overlap, because AI answers are assembled from web sources. But a page can rank well and still never be quoted, and a page nobody ranks for can be cited constantly.

• Ranking is positional; an AI answer either includes you or it does not
• AI answers synthesize several sources, so citation quality matters more than one keyword
• Framing is part of the result, since the assistant writes a description alongside the mention
• Seerly reports both together, plus your Google search footprint for the same brand

Most marketing teams read them side by side rather than choosing between them.

Yes. Seerly records every brand that appears alongside yours in a tracked AI answer, so you can see who is being recommended for the questions you care about and how often.

Competitors are read from the same runs as your own results, which means the comparison always uses identical prompts, engines, and dates.

• Share of voice across your tracked prompt set, per engine
• Prompts where a competitor appears and your brand does not
• Head to head, your brand beside one competitor, topic by topic and source by source
• The citation sources doing the work behind a competitor mention
• Movement between runs, so a new entrant is visible early

The useful output is usually the gap list: the specific questions where someone else is the recommended answer.

Available on request, a weekly report also shows what each tracked competitor published, on their own site and on other sites, and what needs your attention.

Seerly tracks ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overview, plus your Google search footprint. How many of those three you see depends on the plan.

Engines are tracked and reported separately, because they read different sources and can describe the same brand in noticeably different terms.

• Basic: one engine of your choice, either Google AI Overview or ChatGPT
• Pro: all three, ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overview
• Enterprise: additional engines on request, under a custom scope
• Your Google search footprint alongside the AI results

Results are never merged into a single cross-engine average, so a strong showing in one place cannot quietly hide a weak one somewhere else. Each engine keeps its own trend line.

Seerly reports AI search visibility as a measured before-and-after: a baseline from your first run, then movement over rolling windows, with the underlying AI responses attached to every number.

That structure matters for an executive update, because the obvious follow-up question is always why a number moved, and the answer is one click away.

• Rolling comparisons across 7 days, 30 days, and 3 months
• Visibility, sentiment, and citation counts broken out per engine
• Share of voice against the competitor set you defined
• The verbatim response behind any point on the trend line

Seerly reports what changed and what the engines actually said. It does not forecast where the numbers will land.

Seerly gives you a baseline immediately, usually within a few minutes of the first analysis. Changes in how engines cite and describe you follow as published work is crawled and picked up.

Nobody can promise a date, because the timing depends on how quickly each engine refreshes the sources it draws from for your category.

• The first audit completes within minutes and needs no credit card
• Scheduled runs start building comparable history from day one
• Movement usually shows first in one engine before the others
• Gains compound as more published work enters the citation pool

What Seerly commits to is the measurement: a recorded starting point, and every run after it kept for comparison.

No. Seerly needs no code, no tracking pixel, no DNS change, and no SDK. You enter a domain and the first analysis runs against public pages and public AI responses.

Nothing is instrumented on your site, which is why a marketing team can start without opening a ticket with engineering.

• No access needed to analytics, CMS, ad accounts, or customer data
• Only publicly available website pages and public AI engine responses are analyzed
• A website audit covering 800 pages on Basic, or all pages on Pro
• An optional WordPress connection on Pro, only if you want to publish drafts

Analysis results are private to your account. Seerly is operated by K4 Minds Technologies LLP.

AI search visibility sits next to organic search rather than replacing it, and Seerly is built so the same work feeds both: content that answers a buyer question well tends to rank and to get cited.

In practice most teams run it as an extension of the content and SEO program, not as a separate channel with its own calendar.

• Gaps surface as specific prompts where a competitor is recommended and you are not
• Those gaps convert into briefs and drafts inside the same account
• Your Google search footprint is tracked alongside the AI results
• Content credits cover the drafting: 250 per month on Basic, 1250 on Pro

Teams with a dedicated writing function usually hand the gap list straight to them.