Track who cites your brand. Measure source quality. Grow citation footprint.

Seerly flags new citations at the end of each analysis run, so a source that started appearing this week shows up as soon as that run completes, not in a monthly rollup.

Run frequency is what sets the pace here, and it varies by plan.

• Basic: analysis runs twice a week
• Pro: runs at twice the Basic frequency
• Enterprise: custom run frequency
• Each run separates newly discovered citations from ones already tracked

New citations are worth watching in both directions: a source appearing for the first time can signal an emerging publisher, or a competitor placing work you have not seen yet.

Volume in Seerly counts how many times your pages are cited, while quality describes where those citations come from: how many distinct domains, what type of sites they are, and how much of the total depends on any single source.

A high count sourced almost entirely from your own site is a fragile position, because one crawl change or one competitor page can move it.

• Unique citing domains, and average citations per domain
• Source-type mix, so owned pages are visible separately from third-party coverage
• Concentration risk when a small set of domains carries most citations
• Freshness signals for cited pages that have gone stale

The practical read is balance: earned third-party coverage tends to hold up better than owned pages alone.

Yes. Seerly lets you filter the citation set by source type and open any citing domain to see its full contribution, down to individual URLs and the prompt runs they appeared on.

This turns a long citation list into a short answer about which ecosystems are carrying your brand.

• Filters for marketplace, reference, news, forum, product page, video, and research sources
• Domain detail with citation count movement across runs
• The specific URLs cited, and the prompts that surfaced them
• How much each AI engine contributes to citations from that one domain

Source types where you have no presence are usually the fastest place to find a next action.

Seerly uses citation data to prioritize work: prompts where competitors are cited and you are not become content actions, and the sources quoted in those answers tell you what the winning page had to cover.

It keeps the workflow from stopping at a diagnosis.

• Citation gaps feed the same action queue as visibility gaps
• Content Agent drafts comparison pages, FAQs, and long-form articles against the losing prompt
• Drafts wait in an approvals queue; nothing publishes autonomously
• Optional WordPress publishing on Pro plans once a draft is approved

Re-running the same prompts afterward gives you a measured before-and-after on that specific gap.

Seerly tracks citations on ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overview, and how many of those engines you see depends on your plan.

Engines are kept separate because they cite very different sources for the same question, and a domain that dominates one can be absent from another.

• Basic: one engine of your choice, either Google AI Overview or ChatGPT
• Pro: all three engines, ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overview
• Enterprise: additional engines on request, under a custom scope
• Per-engine citation share for any domain you open

Your Google search footprint is tracked alongside the AI engines on every plan.